对线优势
该对位的场次还不足以比较对线(至少 30 场)。
按段位
各段位中 Leona 对阵 Ambessa 的胜率。
| 段位 | 胜率 | Ambessa 占优50 %Leona 占优 | 对局 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 样本太少 | 4 | ||
| 样本太少 | 14 | ||
| 样本太少 | 20 | ||
| 样本太少 | 24 | ||
| 样本太少 | 26 | ||
| 样本太少 | 18 | ||
| 样本太少 | 3 | ||
| 样本太少 | 1 | ||
| 样本太少 | — | ||
| 样本太少 | — |
各行为实际对局数(共 110 场)。顶部胜率按各段位在全部排位玩家中的占比加权,因此不等于这些行的简单平均。 版本 26.22:38 场,不足以计算胜率
Leona 的其他辅助对线
至少 100 场的对手。 对局来自版本 26.19 至 26.22.
| 英雄 | 50 % | 对局 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72.4 % | +12.5 | 130 | ||
| 69.3 % | +8.7 | 106 | ||
| 66.5 % | +5.2 | 634 | ||
| 65.4 % | +0.2 | 158 | ||
| 64.5 % | −1.1 | 132 | ||
| 64.4 % | −2.3 | 125 | ||
| 63.9 % | +0.9 | 164 | ||
| 63.3 % | −1.2 | 138 | ||
| 62.5 % | +2.5 | 116 | ||
| 62.3 % | +1.2 | 107 | ||
| 62.2 % | +3.7 | 206 | ||
| 62.0 % | +3.4 | 727 | ||
| 61.6 % | +6.0 | 279 | ||
| 61.1 % | +4.3 | 294 | ||
| 61.1 % | −0.6 | 111 | ||
| 60.9 % | +1.7 | 123 | ||
| 60.6 % | ±0.0 | 160 | ||
| 60.4 % | +3.2 | 366 | ||
| 60.3 % | −0.6 | 163 | ||
| 60.2 % | ±0.0 | 412 | ||
| 60.1 % | +2.5 | 898 | ||
| 60.1 % | +2.3 | 140 | ||
| 59.9 % | +0.4 | 1,040 | ||
| 59.8 % | +5.0 | 1,159 | ||
| 59.6 % | +1.5 | 537 | ||
| 59.4 % | +2.5 | 842 | ||
| 59.4 % | −0.9 | 110 | ||
| 59.3 % | +0.6 | 3,052 | ||
| 59.3 % | +2.9 | 724 | ||
| 59.3 % | −1.3 | 243 | ||
| 59.3 % | −5.1 | 132 | ||
| 58.9 % | −0.2 | 401 | ||
| 58.8 % | +0.3 | 635 | ||
| 58.8 % | −0.7 | 398 | ||
| 58.8 % | −7.4 | 142 | ||
| 58.6 % | +0.8 | 290 | ||
| 58.6 % | +3.3 | 276 | ||
| 58.5 % | +5.0 | 770 | ||
| 58.3 % | +1.6 | 10,229 | ||
| 58.2 % | −1.8 | 109 | ||
| 58.0 % | −3.8 | 295 | ||
| 58.0 % | −3.8 | 150 | ||
| 58.0 % | +1.4 | 131 | ||
| 57.9 % | +1.0 | 372 | ||
| 57.8 % | −0.7 | 2,289 | ||
| 57.7 % | −0.5 | 1,067 | ||
| 57.7 % | ±0.0 | 699 | ||
| 57.6 % | −0.5 | 330 | ||
| 57.5 % | +2.0 | 823 | ||
| 57.3 % | +0.8 | 481 | ||
| 57.1 % | +3.0 | 43,966 | ||
| 57.1 % | +1.4 | 6,849 | ||
| 57.0 % | +0.8 | 711 | ||
| 56.5 % | −5.3 | 430 | ||
| 56.3 % | −2.7 | 644 | ||
| 56.2 % | −0.7 | 4,840 | ||
| 56.2 % | −2.6 | 501 | ||
| 56.0 % | +0.5 | 9,476 | ||
| 55.9 % | −1.6 | 229 | ||
| 55.8 % | +2.1 | 776 | ||
| 55.5 % | +0.8 | 1,311 | ||
| 55.4 % | +1.3 | 8,030 | ||
| 55.4 % | −1.4 | 1,133 | ||
| 55.4 % | −1.6 | 692 | ||
| 55.4 % | +1.0 | 545 | ||
| 55.3 % | −2.8 | 240 | ||
| 55.2 % | −3.8 | 2,076 | ||
| 55.1 % | −3.8 | 335 | ||
| 55.0 % | +0.9 | 1,494 | ||
| 55.0 % | −1.6 | 967 | ||
| 54.9 % | +2.1 | 824 | ||
| 54.8 % | −1.1 | 1,203 | ||
| 54.7 % | −0.4 | 1,524 | ||
| 54.6 % | +0.3 | 1,769 | ||
| 54.5 % | +1.2 | 8,085 | ||
| 54.4 % | −1.3 | 1,037 | ||
| 54.3 % | +1.8 | 103,401 | ||
| 54.2 % | ±0.0 | 993 | ||
| 54.1 % | ±0.0 | 3,689 | ||
| 54.0 % | −0.5 | 1,872 | ||
| 53.9 % | +0.2 | 32,672 | ||
| 53.8 % | ±0.0 | 5,353 | ||
| 53.8 % | −1.8 | 483 | ||
| 53.6 % | −5.3 | 506 | ||
| 53.6 % | −6.3 | 458 | ||
| 53.5 % | +0.3 | 2,308 | ||
| 53.5 % | −2.9 | 397 | ||
| 53.5 % | −4.1 | 323 | ||
| 53.5 % | −3.1 | 290 | ||
| 53.4 % | ±0.0 | 47,281 | ||
| 53.4 % | +0.3 | 16,383 | ||
| 53.3 % | −0.7 | 20,604 | ||
| 53.2 % | +0.7 | 73,451 | ||
| 53.1 % | +2.1 | 65,527 | ||
| 53.1 % | −1.0 | 2,769 | ||
| 53.1 % | −0.7 | 3,275 | ||
| 53.0 % | −1.4 | 3,185 | ||
| 53.0 % | +0.7 | 1,522 | ||
| 52.9 % | −0.8 | 803 | ||
| 52.6 % | −1.9 | 1,155 | ||
| 52.5 % | −4.2 | 110 | ||
| 52.4 % | +1.0 | 24,892 | ||
| 52.2 % | −2.2 | 5,991 | ||
| 52.1 % | −1.1 | 34,862 | ||
| 52.0 % | −3.6 | 854 | ||
| 51.9 % | +0.8 | 16,307 | ||
| 51.9 % | +1.8 | 5,815 | ||
| 51.6 % | −0.4 | 3,701 | ||
| 51.5 % | −6.4 | 315 | ||
| 51.5 % | −4.2 | 178 | ||
| 51.4 % | −2.5 | 1,765 | ||
| 51.3 % | −2.9 | 790 | ||
| 51.1 % | −0.6 | 5,619 | ||
| 51.1 % | −1.4 | 402 | ||
| 51.0 % | −0.8 | 86,177 | ||
| 51.0 % | −1.1 | 2,630 | ||
| 51.0 % | −1.0 | 2,196 | ||
| 51.0 % | −2.4 | 1,515 | ||
| 51.0 % | −5.3 | 713 | ||
| 51.0 % | −1.2 | 493 | ||
| 50.9 % | +0.3 | 50,255 | ||
| 50.8 % | ±0.0 | 20,013 | ||
| 50.8 % | −1.5 | 3,418 | ||
| 50.7 % | −1.5 | 28,057 | ||
| 50.6 % | −0.6 | 109,909 | ||
| 50.5 % | −0.8 | 28,202 | ||
| 50.5 % | −2.0 | 10,037 | ||
| 50.5 % | −2.5 | 2,109 | ||
| 50.5 % | −3.2 | 684 | ||
| 50.4 % | −1.1 | 40,436 | ||
| 50.4 % | −0.9 | 28,199 | ||
| 50.4 % | −1.1 | 7,525 | ||
| 50.4 % | −4.1 | 811 | ||
| 50.2 % | −0.8 | 8,300 | ||
| 50.2 % | −1.8 | 8,535 | ||
| 50.0 % | −1.2 | 54,584 | ||
| 50.0 % | −0.4 | 29,848 | ||
| 50.0 % | −1.5 | 5,021 | ||
| 49.9 % | −0.5 | 28,037 | ||
| 49.9 % | −1.0 | 30,576 | ||
| 49.9 % | −0.7 | 16,384 | ||
| 49.9 % | −3.3 | 1,122 | ||
| 49.8 % | −1.1 | 67,652 | ||
| 49.8 % | −3.5 | 692 | ||
| 49.7 % | −0.7 | 46,459 | ||
| 49.7 % | −4.4 | 196 | ||
| 49.6 % | −1.1 | 40,776 | ||
| 49.5 % | −1.2 | 26,233 | ||
| 49.4 % | −2.0 | 13,713 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.8 | 28,473 | ||
| 48.8 % | −3.3 | 36,522 | ||
| 48.2 % | −2.5 | 15,992 | ||
| 48.0 % | −3.2 | 67,764 | ||
| 47.7 % | −1.4 | 12,522 |
Leona 对 Ambessa:常见问题
Leona 和 Ambessa 谁能赢?
在 110 场排位对局中,Leona 在辅助对阵 Ambessa 的胜率为 59.4 %,其余 40.6 % 由 Ambessa 获胜。
Ambessa 对 Leona 来说难打吗?
按两位英雄在辅助各自的胜率推算,Leona 的预期胜率为 60.3 %。实际 59.4 % 低了 0.9 个百分点:这组对位对 Leona 比两位英雄强度所显示的更难打。 按胜率排序,Ambessa 在 Leona 至少 100 场的辅助对手中排第 26 位(共 154 位)。
谁克制 Ambessa?
辅助对 Ambessa 胜率最高的是:Seraphine(63.8 %)、Lulu(61.7 %)和 Nautilus(58.8 %)。
数据来自 ggez.gg 通过 Riot API 收集的排位对局。