对线优势
该对位的场次还不足以比较对线(至少 30 场)。
按段位
各段位中 Nasus 对阵 Aphelios 的胜率。
| 段位 | 胜率 | Aphelios 占优50 %Nasus 占优 | 对局 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 样本太少 | 1 | ||
| 样本太少 | 8 | ||
| 样本太少 | 16 | ||
| 样本太少 | 17 | ||
| 样本太少 | 25 | ||
| 样本太少 | 20 | ||
| 样本太少 | 9 | ||
| 样本太少 | 9 | ||
| 样本太少 | — | ||
| 样本太少 | — |
各行为实际对局数(共 105 场)。顶部胜率按各段位在全部排位玩家中的占比加权,因此不等于这些行的简单平均。 版本 26.22:30 场,不足以计算胜率
Nasus 的其他上单对线
至少 100 场的对手。 对局来自版本 26.19 至 26.22.
| 英雄 | 50 % | 对局 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65.7 % | +11.7 | 105 | ||
| 63.3 % | +4.3 | 451 | ||
| 62.2 % | +5.9 | 445 | ||
| 62.0 % | +0.3 | 124 | ||
| 61.7 % | +7.9 | 675 | ||
| 60.7 % | +5.7 | 924 | ||
| 60.0 % | +1.8 | 215 | ||
| 59.8 % | +4.0 | 867 | ||
| 59.5 % | +7.1 | 498 | ||
| 59.5 % | +7.0 | 190 | ||
| 59.3 % | +4.5 | 753 | ||
| 59.0 % | +6.4 | 122 | ||
| 58.9 % | +3.1 | 1,228 | ||
| 58.7 % | −5.1 | 117 | ||
| 58.7 % | +3.3 | 150 | ||
| 58.6 % | +9.0 | 396 | ||
| 58.6 % | +0.4 | 141 | ||
| 58.5 % | +1.6 | 327 | ||
| 58.4 % | +7.4 | 141 | ||
| 58.3 % | +2.9 | 882 | ||
| 58.3 % | +4.3 | 124 | ||
| 58.2 % | +6.2 | 616 | ||
| 58.1 % | +2.6 | 360 | ||
| 58.0 % | +5.9 | 4,872 | ||
| 57.9 % | +3.8 | 348 | ||
| 57.7 % | +0.1 | 188 | ||
| 57.5 % | −1.3 | 212 | ||
| 57.4 % | +4.9 | 278 | ||
| 57.3 % | +3.7 | 452 | ||
| 57.3 % | +1.7 | 362 | ||
| 56.9 % | +4.3 | 1,607 | ||
| 56.7 % | +3.7 | 512 | ||
| 56.5 % | +3.1 | 1,546 | ||
| 56.3 % | +0.1 | 878 | ||
| 56.3 % | +2.5 | 876 | ||
| 56.1 % | +3.5 | 737 | ||
| 56.0 % | +5.8 | 470 | ||
| 55.8 % | +2.7 | 6,420 | ||
| 55.8 % | +3.1 | 436 | ||
| 55.6 % | +5.0 | 2,740 | ||
| 55.6 % | −0.2 | 309 | ||
| 55.5 % | +1.3 | 701 | ||
| 55.5 % | +0.4 | 266 | ||
| 55.4 % | +3.9 | 332 | ||
| 55.2 % | +0.5 | 748 | ||
| 55.2 % | +5.6 | 379 | ||
| 55.1 % | +5.0 | 1,981 | ||
| 54.8 % | +1.5 | 682 | ||
| 54.8 % | +3.0 | 480 | ||
| 54.7 % | +1.0 | 15,696 | ||
| 54.7 % | ±0.0 | 2,815 | ||
| 54.4 % | +0.3 | 545 | ||
| 54.3 % | +2.9 | 177 | ||
| 54.2 % | +1.3 | 7,295 | ||
| 54.2 % | +2.8 | 3,466 | ||
| 54.2 % | +2.8 | 932 | ||
| 54.2 % | −3.9 | 798 | ||
| 54.2 % | +2.8 | 797 | ||
| 54.1 % | +1.6 | 593 | ||
| 54.0 % | +3.5 | 17,516 | ||
| 54.0 % | +0.2 | 6,465 | ||
| 54.0 % | −2.8 | 461 | ||
| 54.0 % | −1.7 | 321 | ||
| 53.9 % | +1.9 | 11,651 | ||
| 53.8 % | +2.1 | 16,490 | ||
| 53.8 % | +2.3 | 598 | ||
| 53.7 % | +1.7 | 7,330 | ||
| 53.6 % | +3.3 | 9,473 | ||
| 53.6 % | +2.2 | 885 | ||
| 53.5 % | +1.3 | 454 | ||
| 53.4 % | +3.8 | 1,110 | ||
| 53.2 % | +2.7 | 1,110 | ||
| 53.1 % | +0.3 | 11,997 | ||
| 53.1 % | +2.8 | 331 | ||
| 52.9 % | −3.1 | 10,511 | ||
| 52.8 % | +2.0 | 13,005 | ||
| 52.8 % | −2.0 | 2,385 | ||
| 52.8 % | +3.2 | 368 | ||
| 52.7 % | +3.3 | 32,871 | ||
| 52.7 % | ±0.0 | 241 | ||
| 52.6 % | +2.0 | 12,533 | ||
| 52.5 % | −1.7 | 5,566 | ||
| 52.5 % | −0.9 | 1,747 | ||
| 52.4 % | +2.7 | 13,319 | ||
| 52.3 % | +0.9 | 19,137 | ||
| 52.2 % | −1.4 | 198 | ||
| 52.1 % | −0.1 | 626 | ||
| 52.1 % | −3.1 | 441 | ||
| 52.0 % | +1.1 | 1,798 | ||
| 52.0 % | −0.5 | 328 | ||
| 51.8 % | −0.9 | 1,734 | ||
| 51.8 % | +0.8 | 1,614 | ||
| 51.7 % | +0.2 | 11,719 | ||
| 51.6 % | +1.9 | 1,069 | ||
| 51.5 % | −2.1 | 683 | ||
| 51.4 % | −1.3 | 1,312 | ||
| 51.2 % | −0.6 | 9,994 | ||
| 51.2 % | +1.5 | 4,447 | ||
| 51.0 % | +1.3 | 16,003 | ||
| 51.0 % | −0.2 | 2,620 | ||
| 50.9 % | +2.0 | 12,634 | ||
| 50.9 % | −2.3 | 10,799 | ||
| 50.9 % | +2.8 | 630 | ||
| 50.8 % | −0.2 | 10,731 | ||
| 50.7 % | +0.1 | 2,622 | ||
| 50.7 % | −4.5 | 324 | ||
| 50.6 % | +0.7 | 19,589 | ||
| 50.5 % | −0.5 | 14,014 | ||
| 50.5 % | −2.8 | 3,287 | ||
| 50.4 % | −3.5 | 169 | ||
| 50.3 % | −0.2 | 19,437 | ||
| 50.3 % | +0.4 | 450 | ||
| 50.0 % | −0.7 | 15,567 | ||
| 50.0 % | −1.6 | 11,161 | ||
| 49.9 % | −0.5 | 2,068 | ||
| 49.8 % | −1.7 | 11,548 | ||
| 49.8 % | −0.2 | 2,925 | ||
| 49.5 % | −0.3 | 5,306 | ||
| 49.4 % | −1.9 | 37,372 | ||
| 49.4 % | −5.6 | 421 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.9 | 35,631 | ||
| 48.9 % | −1.2 | 1,413 | ||
| 48.8 % | −1.8 | 20,126 | ||
| 48.8 % | −2.1 | 10,116 | ||
| 48.7 % | −0.6 | 30,371 | ||
| 48.6 % | −0.6 | 27,984 | ||
| 48.4 % | −0.9 | 32,411 | ||
| 48.4 % | −1.0 | 12,477 | ||
| 48.1 % | −2.2 | 13,661 | ||
| 48.0 % | −3.2 | 819 | ||
| 47.7 % | −3.6 | 23,421 | ||
| 47.5 % | −4.1 | 4,036 | ||
| 47.4 % | −1.5 | 1,438 | ||
| 47.4 % | −0.6 | 826 | ||
| 47.1 % | −3.3 | 11,904 | ||
| 47.0 % | −5.9 | 363 | ||
| 46.9 % | −3.1 | 9,680 | ||
| 46.9 % | −2.4 | 577 | ||
| 46.9 % | −5.6 | 139 | ||
| 46.6 % | −3.8 | 2,450 | ||
| 46.3 % | −3.1 | 45,919 | ||
| 46.2 % | −3.1 | 12,848 | ||
| 46.0 % | −4.5 | 1,283 | ||
| 45.5 % | −3.8 | 19,488 | ||
| 43.5 % | −5.7 | 1,240 |
Nasus 对 Aphelios:常见问题
Nasus 和 Aphelios 谁能赢?
在 105 场排位对局中,Nasus 在上单对阵 Aphelios 的胜率为 65.7 %,其余 34.3 % 由 Aphelios 获胜。
Aphelios 对 Nasus 来说难打吗?
按两位英雄在上单各自的胜率推算,Nasus 的预期胜率为 54.0 %。实际 65.7 % 高出 11.7 个百分点:这组对位对 Nasus 比两位英雄强度所显示的更有利。 按胜率排序,Aphelios 在 Nasus 至少 100 场的上单对手中排第 1 位(共 145 位)。
谁克制 Aphelios?
上单对 Aphelios 胜率最高的是:Yasuo(62.7 %)、Irelia(62.3 %)和 Renekton(61.9 %)。
数据来自 ggez.gg 通过 Riot API 收集的排位对局。