对线优势
该对位的场次还不足以比较对线(至少 30 场)。
按段位
各段位中 Caitlyn 对阵 Vi 的胜率。
| 段位 | 胜率 | Vi 占优50 %Caitlyn 占优 | 对局 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 样本太少 | 2 | ||
| 样本太少 | 12 | ||
| 样本太少 | 25 | ||
| 样本太少 | 24 | ||
| 样本太少 | 21 | ||
| 样本太少 | 20 | ||
| 样本太少 | 5 | ||
| 样本太少 | — | ||
| 样本太少 | — | ||
| 样本太少 | — |
各行为实际对局数(共 109 场)。顶部胜率按各段位在全部排位玩家中的占比加权,因此不等于这些行的简单平均。 版本 26.22:36 场,不足以计算胜率
Caitlyn 的其他下路对线
至少 100 场的对手。 对局来自版本 26.19 至 26.22.
| 英雄 | 50 % | 对局 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70.1 % | +6.6 | 137 | ||
| 68.0 % | +2.7 | 237 | ||
| 66.4 % | +7.7 | 137 | ||
| 65.2 % | +0.9 | 128 | ||
| 63.7 % | +7.5 | 111 | ||
| 62.8 % | +6.5 | 230 | ||
| 62.0 % | +7.5 | 109 | ||
| 61.4 % | +6.5 | 195 | ||
| 60.7 % | −0.9 | 120 | ||
| 59.6 % | +0.6 | 316 | ||
| 58.1 % | +3.6 | 334 | ||
| 57.5 % | +1.5 | 247 | ||
| 57.0 % | +1.8 | 168 | ||
| 56.7 % | −0.7 | 344 | ||
| 56.7 % | +4.0 | 227 | ||
| 56.1 % | +2.6 | 798 | ||
| 55.5 % | +5.3 | 584 | ||
| 55.3 % | +0.5 | 478 | ||
| 55.2 % | +4.1 | 107 | ||
| 54.7 % | +3.1 | 175 | ||
| 54.3 % | +1.9 | 461 | ||
| 54.2 % | +0.3 | 101 | ||
| 54.1 % | +3.2 | 892 | ||
| 54.1 % | −3.3 | 475 | ||
| 54.1 % | +3.4 | 273 | ||
| 54.1 % | −0.2 | 267 | ||
| 54.0 % | +2.7 | 344 | ||
| 53.8 % | −0.1 | 188 | ||
| 53.7 % | −2.8 | 471 | ||
| 53.4 % | +3.1 | 2,356 | ||
| 53.4 % | +4.2 | 256 | ||
| 53.2 % | +1.3 | 2,249 | ||
| 53.0 % | +0.9 | 1,176 | ||
| 52.9 % | +1.0 | 117 | ||
| 52.7 % | +1.9 | 423 | ||
| 52.5 % | +3.1 | 349 | ||
| 52.1 % | +1.5 | 1,009 | ||
| 52.1 % | −1.4 | 511 | ||
| 52.0 % | +1.6 | 1,564 | ||
| 52.0 % | −2.1 | 731 | ||
| 52.0 % | +0.6 | 523 | ||
| 52.0 % | +0.8 | 336 | ||
| 51.9 % | +2.0 | 1,278 | ||
| 51.8 % | −2.8 | 358 | ||
| 51.6 % | +0.8 | 591 | ||
| 51.6 % | −2.6 | 393 | ||
| 51.5 % | −2.8 | 628 | ||
| 51.5 % | +1.3 | 223 | ||
| 51.5 % | −3.6 | 123 | ||
| 51.4 % | −1.8 | 646 | ||
| 51.4 % | −0.5 | 390 | ||
| 51.3 % | +1.0 | 21,371 | ||
| 51.3 % | +2.9 | 246 | ||
| 51.2 % | −1.4 | 237,660 | ||
| 51.2 % | −2.0 | 432 | ||
| 51.1 % | −2.2 | 822 | ||
| 51.0 % | +3.0 | 357 | ||
| 50.9 % | +1.0 | 125,766 | ||
| 50.8 % | +1.9 | 6,576 | ||
| 50.8 % | −4.2 | 172 | ||
| 50.7 % | +0.5 | 54,366 | ||
| 50.6 % | ±0.0 | 109,502 | ||
| 50.5 % | +0.6 | 57,603 | ||
| 50.4 % | +2.0 | 397 | ||
| 50.3 % | +0.9 | 1,236 | ||
| 50.3 % | +2.6 | 355 | ||
| 50.1 % | −0.1 | 45,772 | ||
| 49.9 % | −0.4 | 60,337 | ||
| 49.9 % | +1.9 | 4,036 | ||
| 49.8 % | −2.7 | 295 | ||
| 49.7 % | +0.3 | 137,780 | ||
| 49.7 % | +1.0 | 401 | ||
| 49.6 % | −0.3 | 134,676 | ||
| 49.5 % | −3.0 | 350 | ||
| 49.4 % | +0.1 | 62,859 | ||
| 49.4 % | −0.2 | 1,551 | ||
| 49.3 % | −1.4 | 417 | ||
| 49.2 % | −0.1 | 89,284 | ||
| 49.2 % | +1.2 | 40,300 | ||
| 49.1 % | +4.2 | 375 | ||
| 49.0 % | −0.4 | 279,775 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.7 | 16,294 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.3 | 231 | ||
| 48.9 % | −2.2 | 243 | ||
| 48.7 % | −0.5 | 934 | ||
| 48.7 % | +0.5 | 652 | ||
| 48.7 % | +0.2 | 553 | ||
| 48.6 % | +0.8 | 79,075 | ||
| 48.3 % | −0.3 | 20,504 | ||
| 48.3 % | ±0.0 | 1,581 | ||
| 48.3 % | −0.7 | 178 | ||
| 48.2 % | +0.5 | 3,205 | ||
| 48.1 % | −1.6 | 967 | ||
| 48.1 % | −0.6 | 712 | ||
| 47.9 % | −0.6 | 68,676 | ||
| 47.9 % | −2.3 | 995 | ||
| 47.8 % | −1.4 | 365,294 | ||
| 47.8 % | +1.7 | 3,131 | ||
| 47.7 % | −0.4 | 262,621 | ||
| 47.7 % | −0.1 | 81,821 | ||
| 47.6 % | +0.5 | 1,313 | ||
| 47.5 % | ±0.0 | 251,222 | ||
| 47.5 % | +0.7 | 12,710 | ||
| 47.4 % | +0.7 | 31,793 | ||
| 47.3 % | ±0.0 | 73,801 | ||
| 47.2 % | −3.5 | 510 | ||
| 46.9 % | −1.3 | 6,202 | ||
| 46.7 % | −0.4 | 1,805 | ||
| 46.7 % | −3.7 | 627 | ||
| 46.6 % | −0.7 | 33,808 | ||
| 46.6 % | ±0.0 | 7,009 | ||
| 46.5 % | −1.4 | 8,479 | ||
| 46.5 % | −1.5 | 843 | ||
| 46.0 % | +0.3 | 4,943 | ||
| 46.0 % | +0.3 | 1,503 | ||
| 46.0 % | −2.3 | 749 | ||
| 45.9 % | −1.5 | 3,889 | ||
| 45.9 % | −1.8 | 254 | ||
| 45.6 % | −2.1 | 33,649 | ||
| 45.5 % | −1.1 | 505 | ||
| 45.0 % | −0.9 | 18,417 | ||
| 44.9 % | −0.5 | 10,901 | ||
| 44.4 % | −1.8 | 9,596 | ||
| 44.3 % | −2.4 | 9,499 | ||
| 44.1 % | −1.9 | 10,166 | ||
| 43.9 % | −1.4 | 6,713 | ||
| 43.5 % | −1.4 | 2,036 | ||
| 43.3 % | −2.2 | 7,174 | ||
| 43.0 % | −3.1 | 9,154 | ||
| 42.9 % | −8.4 | 216 | ||
| 42.6 % | −6.6 | 187 |
Caitlyn 对 Vi:常见问题
Caitlyn 和 Vi 谁能赢?
在 109 场排位对局中,Caitlyn 在下路对阵 Vi 的胜率为 62.0 %,其余 38.0 % 由 Vi 获胜。
Vi 对 Caitlyn 来说难打吗?
按两位英雄在下路各自的胜率推算,Caitlyn 的预期胜率为 54.5 %。实际 62.0 % 高出 7.5 个百分点:这组对位对 Caitlyn 比两位英雄强度所显示的更有利。 按胜率排序,Vi 在 Caitlyn 至少 100 场的下路对手中排第 7 位(共 131 位)。
谁克制 Vi?
下路对 Vi 胜率最高的是:Miss Fortune(62.8 %)、Jhin(63.2 %)和 Jinx(51.6 %)。
数据来自 ggez.gg 通过 Riot API 收集的排位对局。