Lane lead
Braum against Xin Zhao at 10 and 15 minutes, average of 138 ranked games (Solo/Duo, last 30 days). Plus = Braum is ahead.
| at 10 min | at 15 min | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | −201Braum against everyone: −135 | −343Braum against everyone: −233 |
| CS | −1.4Braum against everyone: −0.3 | −5.0Braum against everyone: −1.3 |
| Experience | +131Braum against everyone: −45 | +204Braum against everyone: −75 |
By rank
Braum win rate against Xin Zhao in each rank.
| Rank | Win Rate | Xin Zhao wins50 %Braum wins | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| too few games | 4 | ||
| too few games | 15 | ||
| too few games | 11 | ||
| too few games | 35 | ||
| too few games | 31 | ||
| too few games | 35 | ||
| too few games | 18 | ||
| too few games | 8 | ||
| too few games | — | ||
| too few games | 1 |
Rows count games as played (158 in all). The win rate in the head weights each rank by its share of all ranked players, so it is not the plain average of these rows. Patch 26.22: 45 games, too few for a win rate
Braum's other Support matchups
Opponents with at least 100 games. Games from patch 26.19 to 26.22.
| Champion | 50 % | Games | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65.6 % | +6.5 | 122 | ||
| 65.3 % | +7.6 | 138 | ||
| 64.3 % | +5.6 | 132 | ||
| 63.5 % | +5.8 | 189 | ||
| 63.3 % | +6.1 | 320 | ||
| 62.8 % | +4.4 | 159 | ||
| 62.3 % | +6.5 | 284 | ||
| 62.3 % | +5.7 | 234 | ||
| 62.1 % | +3.5 | 230 | ||
| 61.4 % | +4.6 | 137 | ||
| 61.3 % | +2.7 | 806 | ||
| 61.2 % | −0.2 | 159 | ||
| 60.8 % | +3.7 | 111 | ||
| 60.7 % | +4.5 | 388 | ||
| 60.6 % | +6.5 | 289 | ||
| 60.4 % | +3.2 | 132 | ||
| 60.2 % | +6.4 | 298 | ||
| 59.9 % | +0.1 | 180 | ||
| 59.7 % | +1.2 | 155 | ||
| 59.6 % | +4.3 | 389 | ||
| 59.2 % | +0.9 | 1,337 | ||
| 58.8 % | +0.6 | 279 | ||
| 58.7 % | +3.5 | 330 | ||
| 58.5 % | +3.4 | 358 | ||
| 58.5 % | +2.1 | 113 | ||
| 58.0 % | +0.2 | 367 | ||
| 57.7 % | +3.4 | 408 | ||
| 57.5 % | +1.0 | 334 | ||
| 57.5 % | −2.0 | 209 | ||
| 57.4 % | +1.9 | 365 | ||
| 57.2 % | +1.3 | 302 | ||
| 57.1 % | +1.8 | 3,477 | ||
| 56.8 % | −1.3 | 886 | ||
| 56.3 % | +1.2 | 3,489 | ||
| 56.1 % | +1.2 | 128 | ||
| 55.9 % | −0.4 | 3,379 | ||
| 55.9 % | −0.6 | 2,117 | ||
| 55.9 % | +1.8 | 508 | ||
| 55.8 % | −0.2 | 259 | ||
| 55.7 % | +2.0 | 16,345 | ||
| 55.5 % | +1.6 | 715 | ||
| 55.5 % | +3.7 | 177 | ||
| 55.4 % | +2.5 | 3,449 | ||
| 55.2 % | +1.4 | 353 | ||
| 55.1 % | −2.2 | 282 | ||
| 55.1 % | +3.0 | 154 | ||
| 54.9 % | +1.5 | 1,363 | ||
| 54.6 % | +1.5 | 328 | ||
| 54.6 % | +1.3 | 286 | ||
| 54.5 % | +0.5 | 199 | ||
| 54.3 % | +1.0 | 14,937 | ||
| 54.0 % | −2.1 | 161 | ||
| 54.0 % | −2.5 | 158 | ||
| 53.9 % | +0.9 | 643 | ||
| 53.6 % | +0.2 | 2,317 | ||
| 53.5 % | −1.7 | 169 | ||
| 53.4 % | +0.6 | 19,387 | ||
| 53.4 % | +1.8 | 912 | ||
| 53.3 % | +1.2 | 65,642 | ||
| 53.3 % | −0.4 | 995 | ||
| 53.3 % | −0.7 | 1,052 | ||
| 53.3 % | −4.8 | 218 | ||
| 53.3 % | −4.2 | 109 | ||
| 53.1 % | +1.5 | 1,609 | ||
| 53.1 % | +0.5 | 908 | ||
| 53.1 % | −3.3 | 455 | ||
| 53.0 % | −6.1 | 341 | ||
| 52.7 % | −1.0 | 1,452 | ||
| 52.7 % | −8.2 | 227 | ||
| 52.5 % | +1.9 | 32,895 | ||
| 52.4 % | −0.6 | 21,506 | ||
| 52.4 % | +1.1 | 2,243 | ||
| 52.4 % | −1.3 | 699 | ||
| 52.3 % | +0.5 | 11,731 | ||
| 52.2 % | +0.1 | 37,222 | ||
| 52.1 % | −2.0 | 785 | ||
| 52.0 % | −1.7 | 2,739 | ||
| 51.9 % | −0.5 | 321 | ||
| 51.8 % | +1.1 | 7,432 | ||
| 51.8 % | +0.2 | 3,322 | ||
| 51.6 % | −2.0 | 9,673 | ||
| 51.6 % | −0.5 | 3,900 | ||
| 51.5 % | −3.7 | 106 | ||
| 51.4 % | +0.3 | 2,939 | ||
| 51.3 % | +0.2 | 2,119 | ||
| 51.1 % | −2.9 | 2,120 | ||
| 51.0 % | +0.2 | 67,706 | ||
| 51.0 % | −1.7 | 6,764 | ||
| 51.0 % | +1.3 | 2,578 | ||
| 50.9 % | +0.6 | 20,161 | ||
| 50.9 % | −1.9 | 491 | ||
| 50.8 % | −0.6 | 28,115 | ||
| 50.8 % | +0.4 | 5,898 | ||
| 50.8 % | −1.1 | 1,384 | ||
| 50.7 % | −0.3 | 6,711 | ||
| 50.6 % | −2.3 | 298 | ||
| 50.4 % | −0.6 | 8,644 | ||
| 50.4 % | −1.3 | 1,174 | ||
| 50.2 % | ±0.0 | 25,285 | ||
| 50.1 % | −0.7 | 23,691 | ||
| 50.0 % | −0.4 | 11,560 | ||
| 49.9 % | −3.6 | 551 | ||
| 49.7 % | −2.0 | 14,069 | ||
| 49.7 % | −0.5 | 6,850 | ||
| 49.6 % | −0.9 | 12,453 | ||
| 49.5 % | −1.4 | 15,822 | ||
| 49.5 % | −6.5 | 158 | ||
| 49.4 % | −0.2 | 46,302 | ||
| 49.3 % | −1.2 | 27,735 | ||
| 49.2 % | −5.5 | 509 | ||
| 49.1 % | −4.2 | 301 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.0 | 10,194 | ||
| 49.0 % | −4.3 | 316 | ||
| 48.8 % | −2.0 | 20,407 | ||
| 48.8 % | −1.2 | 14,923 | ||
| 48.6 % | −2.3 | 11,056 | ||
| 48.4 % | −3.5 | 622 | ||
| 48.4 % | −6.0 | 560 | ||
| 48.1 % | −0.6 | 5,214 | ||
| 47.9 % | −4.9 | 715 | ||
| 47.5 % | −2.8 | 10,109 | ||
| 47.1 % | −4.0 | 19,936 | ||
| 47.0 % | −3.6 | 2,869 | ||
| 45.9 % | −4.4 | 7,883 |
Braum vs Xin Zhao: questions and answers
Who wins, Braum or Xin Zhao?
Braum wins 54.0 % of Support games against Xin Zhao, from 158 ranked games. Xin Zhao wins the other 46.0 %.
Who wins the lane, Braum or Xin Zhao?
At 15 minutes Braum is 343 gold behind Xin Zhao on average, with −5.0 CS and +204 XP against Xin Zhao, from 138 games with lane data.
Is Xin Zhao a hard matchup for Braum?
Both champions’ own win rates in the Support role predict 56.5 % for Braum. The real 54.0 % is 2.5 points lower: this matchup is harder for Braum than the two champions’ strength suggests. By win rate, Xin Zhao is place 52 of 124 among Braum’s Support opponents with at least 100 games.
Who counters Xin Zhao?
The highest win rates against Xin Zhao in the Support role: Alistar (61.2 %), Rakan (62.1 %) and Thresh (58.9 %).
From ranked games ggez.gg collected through the Riot API.