Lane lead
Braum against Naafiri at 10 and 15 minutes, average of 114 ranked games (Solo/Duo, last 30 days). Plus = Braum is ahead.
| at 10 min | at 15 min | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | −589Braum against everyone: −135 | −961Braum against everyone: −233 |
| CS | −6.6Braum against everyone: −0.3 | −12.1Braum against everyone: −1.3 |
| Experience | −70Braum against everyone: −45 | −138Braum against everyone: −75 |
By rank
Braum win rate against Naafiri in each rank.
| Rank | Win Rate | Naafiri wins50 %Braum wins | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| too few games | 2 | ||
| too few games | 9 | ||
| too few games | 16 | ||
| too few games | 24 | ||
| too few games | 30 | ||
| too few games | 29 | ||
| too few games | 12 | ||
| too few games | 8 | ||
| too few games | — | ||
| too few games | — |
Rows count games as played (130 in all). The win rate in the head weights each rank by its share of all ranked players, so it is not the plain average of these rows. Patch 26.22: 43 games, too few for a win rate
Braum's other Support matchups
Opponents with at least 100 games. Games from patch 26.19 to 26.22.
| Champion | 50 % | Games | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65.8 % | +8.1 | 136 | ||
| 65.6 % | +6.4 | 122 | ||
| 64.6 % | +6.0 | 131 | ||
| 63.4 % | +5.8 | 188 | ||
| 63.3 % | +4.8 | 156 | ||
| 63.2 % | +5.9 | 318 | ||
| 62.7 % | +6.1 | 233 | ||
| 62.3 % | +6.5 | 279 | ||
| 62.0 % | +3.4 | 229 | ||
| 61.3 % | +2.7 | 796 | ||
| 61.2 % | −0.1 | 156 | ||
| 61.2 % | +4.4 | 136 | ||
| 61.0 % | +4.9 | 380 | ||
| 60.3 % | +3.2 | 110 | ||
| 60.2 % | +6.1 | 285 | ||
| 60.1 % | +6.4 | 294 | ||
| 59.9 % | +4.6 | 382 | ||
| 59.9 % | +2.9 | 130 | ||
| 59.7 % | +1.0 | 155 | ||
| 59.7 % | ±0.0 | 178 | ||
| 59.0 % | +0.7 | 1,319 | ||
| 59.0 % | +3.9 | 347 | ||
| 58.8 % | +3.7 | 325 | ||
| 58.8 % | +2.4 | 111 | ||
| 58.4 % | +0.1 | 277 | ||
| 58.4 % | +2.0 | 327 | ||
| 58.1 % | −1.3 | 206 | ||
| 57.5 % | −0.5 | 363 | ||
| 57.5 % | +2.1 | 364 | ||
| 57.1 % | +1.8 | 3,442 | ||
| 57.1 % | −1.0 | 870 | ||
| 57.0 % | +2.7 | 398 | ||
| 56.8 % | +1.0 | 298 | ||
| 56.7 % | +1.9 | 127 | ||
| 56.4 % | +1.3 | 3,443 | ||
| 55.9 % | −0.4 | 3,350 | ||
| 55.9 % | −0.6 | 2,096 | ||
| 55.9 % | +1.7 | 503 | ||
| 55.7 % | +2.0 | 16,155 | ||
| 55.6 % | −0.6 | 258 | ||
| 55.5 % | +2.6 | 3,421 | ||
| 55.5 % | −2.0 | 280 | ||
| 55.4 % | +1.5 | 708 | ||
| 55.2 % | +3.2 | 152 | ||
| 55.0 % | +1.6 | 1,353 | ||
| 55.0 % | +3.1 | 174 | ||
| 54.7 % | +0.9 | 349 | ||
| 54.7 % | +1.5 | 285 | ||
| 54.3 % | +1.0 | 14,744 | ||
| 54.3 % | −2.0 | 157 | ||
| 54.2 % | +0.1 | 195 | ||
| 54.0 % | +1.1 | 325 | ||
| 53.9 % | −3.8 | 108 | ||
| 53.7 % | +0.3 | 2,293 | ||
| 53.7 % | −4.3 | 216 | ||
| 53.5 % | +0.5 | 637 | ||
| 53.5 % | −2.9 | 156 | ||
| 53.4 % | −0.6 | 1,041 | ||
| 53.3 % | +1.2 | 64,643 | ||
| 53.3 % | +1.6 | 898 | ||
| 53.3 % | −1.7 | 165 | ||
| 53.2 % | +0.4 | 19,129 | ||
| 53.2 % | −0.5 | 979 | ||
| 53.2 % | +1.6 | 1,596 | ||
| 53.1 % | −3.2 | 452 | ||
| 53.0 % | +0.3 | 898 | ||
| 52.8 % | −0.9 | 1,420 | ||
| 52.8 % | −8.1 | 223 | ||
| 52.5 % | +1.9 | 32,480 | ||
| 52.5 % | −0.5 | 21,204 | ||
| 52.5 % | −6.4 | 337 | ||
| 52.4 % | +1.1 | 2,215 | ||
| 52.3 % | +0.5 | 11,589 | ||
| 52.2 % | +0.1 | 36,710 | ||
| 52.2 % | −1.5 | 2,707 | ||
| 52.0 % | −1.6 | 688 | ||
| 51.9 % | +1.2 | 7,346 | ||
| 51.9 % | −0.6 | 318 | ||
| 51.8 % | −1.8 | 9,530 | ||
| 51.8 % | +0.2 | 3,283 | ||
| 51.8 % | −2.3 | 774 | ||
| 51.6 % | −0.5 | 3,859 | ||
| 51.5 % | +0.4 | 2,906 | ||
| 51.2 % | +0.1 | 2,096 | ||
| 51.1 % | −1.6 | 6,683 | ||
| 51.0 % | +0.2 | 66,913 | ||
| 51.0 % | +0.7 | 19,909 | ||
| 51.0 % | −3.0 | 2,093 | ||
| 51.0 % | −1.9 | 289 | ||
| 51.0 % | −4.4 | 105 | ||
| 50.9 % | +1.3 | 2,552 | ||
| 50.8 % | −0.6 | 27,772 | ||
| 50.8 % | −0.2 | 6,609 | ||
| 50.8 % | −1.1 | 1,375 | ||
| 50.6 % | +0.2 | 5,813 | ||
| 50.5 % | −2.3 | 482 | ||
| 50.4 % | −0.6 | 8,533 | ||
| 50.2 % | −0.1 | 24,954 | ||
| 50.1 % | −0.7 | 23,351 | ||
| 50.1 % | −1.6 | 1,159 | ||
| 49.9 % | −0.5 | 11,443 | ||
| 49.8 % | −3.5 | 311 | ||
| 49.7 % | −2.1 | 13,887 | ||
| 49.6 % | −0.9 | 12,297 | ||
| 49.6 % | −0.6 | 6,764 | ||
| 49.6 % | −4.0 | 543 | ||
| 49.5 % | −1.4 | 15,588 | ||
| 49.4 % | −0.2 | 45,693 | ||
| 49.3 % | −1.3 | 27,288 | ||
| 49.2 % | −5.5 | 499 | ||
| 49.1 % | −0.9 | 10,080 | ||
| 49.1 % | −4.3 | 298 | ||
| 49.0 % | −7.0 | 156 | ||
| 48.9 % | −1.9 | 20,104 | ||
| 48.9 % | −1.1 | 14,736 | ||
| 48.6 % | −2.3 | 10,932 | ||
| 48.3 % | −3.7 | 609 | ||
| 48.3 % | −6.2 | 553 | ||
| 47.9 % | −0.9 | 5,142 | ||
| 47.8 % | −5.0 | 709 | ||
| 47.6 % | −2.7 | 9,985 | ||
| 47.1 % | −4.0 | 19,656 | ||
| 46.8 % | −3.8 | 2,836 | ||
| 45.9 % | −4.4 | 7,779 |
Braum vs Naafiri: questions and answers
Who wins, Braum or Naafiri?
Braum wins 59.9 % of Support games against Naafiri, from 130 ranked games. Naafiri wins the other 40.1 %.
Who wins the lane, Braum or Naafiri?
At 15 minutes Braum is 961 gold behind Naafiri on average, with −12.1 CS and −138 XP against Naafiri, from 114 games with lane data.
Is Naafiri a hard matchup for Braum?
Both champions’ own win rates in the Support role predict 57.0 % for Braum. The real 59.9 % is 2.9 points higher: this matchup is better for Braum than the two champions’ strength suggests. By win rate, Naafiri is place 17 of 124 among Braum’s Support opponents with at least 100 games.
Who counters Naafiri?
The highest win rates against Naafiri in the Support role: Rell (66.9 %), Alistar (64.6 %) and Janna (69.3 %).
From ranked games ggez.gg collected through the Riot API.