Blitzcrank vs Ambessa
Blitzcrank wins 58.6 % of games against Ambessa, weighted by rank.
Lane lead
Blitzcrank against Ambessa at 10 and 15 minutes, average of 113 ranked games (Solo/Duo, last 30 days). Plus = Blitzcrank is ahead.
| at 10 min | at 15 min | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | −172Blitzcrank against everyone: −132 | −342Blitzcrank against everyone: −223 |
| CS | −5.3Blitzcrank against everyone: −1.6 | −10.2Blitzcrank against everyone: −3.1 |
| Experience | +34Blitzcrank against everyone: −66 | +65Blitzcrank against everyone: −101 |
By rank
Blitzcrank win rate against Ambessa in each rank.
| Rank | Win Rate | Ambessa wins50 %Blitzcrank wins | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| too few games | 7 | ||
| too few games | 10 | ||
| too few games | 19 | ||
| too few games | 33 | ||
| too few games | 27 | ||
| too few games | 12 | ||
| too few games | 10 | ||
| too few games | 9 | ||
| too few games | — | ||
| too few games | — |
Rows count games as played (127 in all). The win rate in the head weights each rank by its share of all ranked players, so it is not the plain average of these rows. Patch 26.22: 43 games, too few for a win rate
Blitzcrank's other Support matchups
Opponents with at least 100 games. Games from patch 26.19 to 26.22.
| Champion | 50 % | Games | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72.7 % | +9.1 | 115 | ||
| 67.9 % | +8.4 | 208 | ||
| 66.6 % | +4.6 | 148 | ||
| 65.2 % | +0.3 | 115 | ||
| 64.4 % | +8.2 | 320 | ||
| 64.0 % | +6.5 | 163 | ||
| 64.0 % | +0.6 | 121 | ||
| 62.7 % | +1.7 | 243 | ||
| 62.2 % | +4.3 | 409 | ||
| 61.1 % | +4.1 | 445 | ||
| 60.6 % | −3.5 | 115 | ||
| 60.4 % | −0.3 | 429 | ||
| 60.3 % | +2.6 | 766 | ||
| 60.3 % | +0.5 | 105 | ||
| 60.2 % | −0.1 | 578 | ||
| 60.0 % | +4.3 | 428 | ||
| 59.4 % | +1.4 | 404 | ||
| 59.4 % | +1.3 | 426 | ||
| 59.4 % | +2.2 | 118 | ||
| 59.3 % | +2.2 | 233 | ||
| 59.3 % | −1.3 | 114 | ||
| 59.1 % | +0.5 | 354 | ||
| 59.0 % | +1.3 | 2,554 | ||
| 59.0 % | +2.2 | 252 | ||
| 59.0 % | −0.6 | 120 | ||
| 58.9 % | +0.9 | 2,047 | ||
| 58.8 % | ±0.0 | 389 | ||
| 58.6 % | −0.3 | 127 | ||
| 58.4 % | +0.1 | 951 | ||
| 58.3 % | +2.6 | 903 | ||
| 57.7 % | +0.2 | 2,114 | ||
| 57.5 % | +2.1 | 262 | ||
| 57.3 % | −0.1 | 498 | ||
| 57.3 % | −7.9 | 115 | ||
| 57.2 % | +0.3 | 498 | ||
| 57.1 % | +2.6 | 726 | ||
| 57.1 % | +1.3 | 258 | ||
| 56.8 % | +3.7 | 630 | ||
| 56.7 % | +1.2 | 761 | ||
| 56.5 % | −1.5 | 596 | ||
| 56.5 % | +0.9 | 129 | ||
| 56.4 % | +1.9 | 8,333 | ||
| 56.4 % | +1.6 | 215 | ||
| 56.2 % | −1.2 | 990 | ||
| 56.1 % | +2.0 | 1,041 | ||
| 56.1 % | +0.9 | 509 | ||
| 55.7 % | +0.5 | 542 | ||
| 55.5 % | +0.7 | 775 | ||
| 55.4 % | −0.4 | 775 | ||
| 55.3 % | −4.4 | 131 | ||
| 55.2 % | −0.7 | 4,400 | ||
| 55.1 % | +1.8 | 1,423 | ||
| 55.0 % | −1.0 | 526 | ||
| 54.7 % | ±0.0 | 5,457 | ||
| 54.7 % | +1.1 | 801 | ||
| 54.6 % | −1.1 | 12,934 | ||
| 54.5 % | +1.4 | 33,649 | ||
| 54.4 % | +1.6 | 698 | ||
| 54.1 % | −5.0 | 435 | ||
| 54.1 % | +0.6 | 411 | ||
| 54.1 % | −1.7 | 338 | ||
| 54.0 % | −0.2 | 246 | ||
| 53.9 % | −3.2 | 276 | ||
| 53.8 % | +1.0 | 4,629 | ||
| 53.8 % | +0.7 | 2,947 | ||
| 53.7 % | −1.9 | 1,006 | ||
| 53.7 % | +2.3 | 1,264 | ||
| 53.6 % | −2.8 | 321 | ||
| 53.5 % | −3.8 | 207 | ||
| 53.4 % | ±0.0 | 4,884 | ||
| 53.4 % | −3.1 | 189 | ||
| 53.3 % | −0.4 | 1,145 | ||
| 53.3 % | −3.4 | 687 | ||
| 53.2 % | +1.0 | 33,568 | ||
| 53.2 % | −0.3 | 1,295 | ||
| 53.1 % | +0.1 | 1,506 | ||
| 53.1 % | −1.8 | 124 | ||
| 52.7 % | +0.3 | 37,493 | ||
| 52.5 % | −0.3 | 2,642 | ||
| 52.5 % | −0.5 | 1,256 | ||
| 52.5 % | −5.6 | 116 | ||
| 52.4 % | −0.6 | 18,048 | ||
| 52.3 % | +0.8 | 64,601 | ||
| 52.2 % | −1.7 | 911 | ||
| 52.2 % | ±0.0 | 844 | ||
| 52.1 % | −0.6 | 650 | ||
| 52.0 % | +1.2 | 87,691 | ||
| 52.0 % | +1.5 | 33,867 | ||
| 52.0 % | +1.6 | 27,555 | ||
| 52.0 % | −0.3 | 7,938 | ||
| 52.0 % | +1.5 | 3,841 | ||
| 51.9 % | −0.8 | 26,589 | ||
| 51.9 % | −0.7 | 562 | ||
| 51.8 % | +2.2 | 13,448 | ||
| 51.8 % | +1.1 | 4,886 | ||
| 51.7 % | −0.2 | 702 | ||
| 51.6 % | −1.9 | 703 | ||
| 51.5 % | −3.0 | 851 | ||
| 51.4 % | +0.1 | 2,730 | ||
| 51.4 % | −1.0 | 1,168 | ||
| 51.4 % | +0.1 | 438 | ||
| 51.1 % | +1.2 | 26,177 | ||
| 51.1 % | −2.3 | 2,711 | ||
| 51.1 % | −2.0 | 2,120 | ||
| 51.0 % | −1.1 | 12,894 | ||
| 51.0 % | −3.7 | 1,002 | ||
| 51.0 % | −0.4 | 256 | ||
| 50.9 % | +1.2 | 31,009 | ||
| 50.9 % | −6.7 | 220 | ||
| 50.9 % | −4.5 | 245 | ||
| 50.6 % | +0.9 | 23,045 | ||
| 50.6 % | +0.8 | 20,804 | ||
| 50.6 % | −2.6 | 700 | ||
| 50.5 % | +0.8 | 39,746 | ||
| 50.4 % | −0.8 | 20,065 | ||
| 50.4 % | −1.1 | 7,623 | ||
| 50.4 % | −0.7 | 1,965 | ||
| 50.4 % | −0.6 | 2,800 | ||
| 50.4 % | −1.9 | 553 | ||
| 50.3 % | −2.8 | 6,320 | ||
| 50.0 % | −1.5 | 68,660 | ||
| 50.0 % | −0.3 | 23,100 | ||
| 49.9 % | +0.2 | 13,003 | ||
| 49.9 % | +0.1 | 8,582 | ||
| 49.7 % | −2.5 | 2,111 | ||
| 49.6 % | −0.4 | 57,652 | ||
| 49.5 % | −0.9 | 9,118 | ||
| 49.4 % | −0.8 | 93,517 | ||
| 49.2 % | −0.2 | 18,403 | ||
| 49.1 % | −2.0 | 1,638 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.2 | 51,324 | ||
| 49.0 % | −1.5 | 6,194 | ||
| 48.8 % | −1.3 | 12,028 | ||
| 48.7 % | −1.3 | 6,425 | ||
| 48.7 % | −5.7 | 364 | ||
| 48.5 % | −2.7 | 25,155 | ||
| 48.5 % | −2.5 | 6,212 | ||
| 48.4 % | −0.6 | 4,429 | ||
| 47.9 % | −5.3 | 166 | ||
| 47.6 % | −2.6 | 39,804 | ||
| 47.2 % | −3.1 | 22,680 | ||
| 47.1 % | −5.0 | 1,627 | ||
| 46.8 % | −2.6 | 19,610 | ||
| 46.6 % | −2.8 | 32,529 | ||
| 46.1 % | −2.9 | 64,481 | ||
| 46.0 % | −6.3 | 560 | ||
| 44.8 % | −3.4 | 7,902 |
Blitzcrank vs Ambessa: questions and answers
Who wins, Blitzcrank or Ambessa?
Blitzcrank wins 58.6 % of Support games against Ambessa, from 127 ranked games. Ambessa wins the other 41.4 %.
Who wins the lane, Blitzcrank or Ambessa?
At 15 minutes Blitzcrank is 342 gold behind Ambessa on average, with −10.2 CS and +65 XP against Ambessa, from 113 games with lane data.
Is Ambessa a hard matchup for Blitzcrank?
Both champions’ own win rates in the Support role predict 58.9 % for Blitzcrank, and the real 58.6 % is about that: the matchup itself favours neither. By win rate, Ambessa is place 28 of 147 among Blitzcrank’s Support opponents with at least 100 games.
Who counters Ambessa?
The highest win rates against Ambessa in the Support role: Seraphine (64.5 %), Lulu (61.4 %) and Leona (59.4 %).
From ranked games ggez.gg collected through the Riot API.