Tahm Kench vs Evelynn
Tahm Kench wins 54.3 % of games against Evelynn, weighted by rank.
Lane lead
Tahm Kench against Evelynn at 10 and 15 minutes, average of 132 ranked games (Solo/Duo, last 30 days). Plus = Tahm Kench is ahead.
| at 10 min | at 15 min | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | +61Tahm Kench against everyone: +33 | −9Tahm Kench against everyone: +106 |
| CS | +0.5Tahm Kench against everyone: +0.9 | +3.2Tahm Kench against everyone: +0.9 |
| Experience | +121Tahm Kench against everyone: +32 | +142Tahm Kench against everyone: +67 |
By rank
Tahm Kench win rate against Evelynn in each rank.
| Rank | Win Rate | Evelynn wins50 %Tahm Kench wins | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| too few games | 10 | ||
| too few games | 15 | ||
| too few games | 22 | ||
| too few games | 32 | ||
| too few games | 27 | ||
| too few games | 30 | ||
| too few games | 9 | ||
| too few games | 4 | ||
| too few games | — | ||
| too few games | — |
Rows count games as played (149 in all). The win rate in the head weights each rank by its share of all ranked players, so it is not the plain average of these rows. Patch 26.22: 52 games, too few for a win rate
Tahm Kench's other Support matchups
Opponents with at least 100 games. Games from patch 26.19 to 26.22.
| Champion | 50 % | Games | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.2 % | +6.2 | 424 | ||
| 61.5 % | +4.6 | 222 | ||
| 60.4 % | +7.3 | 111 | ||
| 59.1 % | +8.1 | 316 | ||
| 58.8 % | +3.3 | 254 | ||
| 58.7 % | +2.4 | 1,004 | ||
| 58.7 % | +2.0 | 244 | ||
| 58.4 % | +1.9 | 1,183 | ||
| 58.1 % | +4.0 | 308 | ||
| 58.0 % | +3.3 | 1,604 | ||
| 58.0 % | +1.2 | 197 | ||
| 57.9 % | +2.5 | 388 | ||
| 57.8 % | −1.8 | 198 | ||
| 57.4 % | +5.5 | 520 | ||
| 57.4 % | −2.2 | 126 | ||
| 57.3 % | +0.5 | 574 | ||
| 57.3 % | ±0.0 | 188 | ||
| 57.1 % | −0.6 | 191 | ||
| 56.9 % | +0.6 | 271 | ||
| 56.8 % | +4.5 | 628 | ||
| 56.7 % | +3.4 | 3,559 | ||
| 56.7 % | +2.5 | 352 | ||
| 56.6 % | +1.8 | 279 | ||
| 56.6 % | +4.4 | 198 | ||
| 56.5 % | +0.6 | 126 | ||
| 56.4 % | +4.3 | 675 | ||
| 56.0 % | −0.6 | 147 | ||
| 55.9 % | +1.4 | 4,345 | ||
| 55.9 % | +0.9 | 145 | ||
| 55.8 % | +1.1 | 143 | ||
| 55.7 % | +1.1 | 385 | ||
| 55.3 % | +1.8 | 314 | ||
| 55.1 % | +2.8 | 342 | ||
| 54.6 % | −2.1 | 161 | ||
| 54.3 % | +3.0 | 302 | ||
| 54.3 % | +4.0 | 149 | ||
| 53.9 % | +0.5 | 311 | ||
| 53.9 % | −0.4 | 195 | ||
| 53.8 % | +2.0 | 6,611 | ||
| 53.8 % | +0.3 | 2,594 | ||
| 53.8 % | +0.5 | 331 | ||
| 53.7 % | +1.8 | 4,115 | ||
| 53.6 % | −2.8 | 316 | ||
| 53.6 % | +2.5 | 262 | ||
| 53.3 % | +1.1 | 2,412 | ||
| 53.2 % | +1.3 | 12,567 | ||
| 53.2 % | −4.8 | 214 | ||
| 52.8 % | −1.6 | 411 | ||
| 52.8 % | −0.6 | 208 | ||
| 52.6 % | +1.1 | 340 | ||
| 52.5 % | −3.4 | 238 | ||
| 52.3 % | +1.2 | 2,926 | ||
| 52.3 % | +0.4 | 1,321 | ||
| 52.3 % | −5.0 | 480 | ||
| 52.3 % | −3.3 | 116 | ||
| 52.2 % | −2.5 | 322 | ||
| 52.1 % | +0.4 | 765 | ||
| 52.1 % | +0.1 | 280 | ||
| 52.1 % | +2.1 | 176 | ||
| 52.0 % | +0.5 | 13,769 | ||
| 51.9 % | +2.1 | 810 | ||
| 51.9 % | +1.3 | 271 | ||
| 51.7 % | +0.9 | 683 | ||
| 51.6 % | ±0.0 | 1,739 | ||
| 51.4 % | +0.5 | 5,769 | ||
| 51.3 % | +2.5 | 3,183 | ||
| 51.3 % | −0.9 | 1,339 | ||
| 51.3 % | −0.2 | 246 | ||
| 51.2 % | −2.2 | 103 | ||
| 51.1 % | +0.8 | 33,315 | ||
| 51.0 % | −0.6 | 1,204 | ||
| 50.9 % | −2.8 | 443 | ||
| 50.8 % | +0.5 | 3,665 | ||
| 50.8 % | −0.2 | 765 | ||
| 50.8 % | −8.3 | 312 | ||
| 50.7 % | −1.8 | 560 | ||
| 50.7 % | −5.2 | 107 | ||
| 50.6 % | −0.4 | 11,669 | ||
| 50.4 % | −2.5 | 498 | ||
| 50.3 % | −0.9 | 16,542 | ||
| 50.3 % | −3.9 | 161 | ||
| 50.0 % | −4.6 | 116 | ||
| 49.8 % | +0.9 | 5,842 | ||
| 49.8 % | +0.5 | 1,763 | ||
| 49.7 % | −2.9 | 368 | ||
| 49.6 % | +0.1 | 1,876 | ||
| 49.6 % | −6.1 | 157 | ||
| 49.5 % | −0.8 | 22,024 | ||
| 49.5 % | −4.5 | 314 | ||
| 49.4 % | −0.7 | 522 | ||
| 49.3 % | −0.3 | 33,237 | ||
| 49.3 % | ±0.0 | 2,728 | ||
| 49.3 % | −2.6 | 1,279 | ||
| 49.3 % | −2.7 | 343 | ||
| 49.1 % | −0.1 | 8,999 | ||
| 49.1 % | +0.5 | 7,146 | ||
| 49.1 % | −2.4 | 372 | ||
| 49.0 % | +0.2 | 20,323 | ||
| 48.8 % | −0.2 | 13,645 | ||
| 48.6 % | +0.1 | 5,326 | ||
| 48.5 % | −0.5 | 19,916 | ||
| 48.4 % | +0.6 | 27,962 | ||
| 48.4 % | −0.1 | 9,097 | ||
| 48.3 % | −0.7 | 36,057 | ||
| 48.3 % | −1.5 | 2,966 | ||
| 48.3 % | −1.8 | 1,225 | ||
| 48.1 % | −1.8 | 1,142 | ||
| 47.8 % | −2.0 | 1,024 | ||
| 47.7 % | −1.0 | 23,960 | ||
| 47.7 % | −0.7 | 5,472 | ||
| 47.6 % | −1.7 | 15,170 | ||
| 47.5 % | −1.0 | 11,067 | ||
| 47.5 % | −1.1 | 4,096 | ||
| 47.4 % | −0.8 | 9,639 | ||
| 47.3 % | −3.9 | 559 | ||
| 47.2 % | −1.9 | 13,025 | ||
| 47.2 % | −1.0 | 10,737 | ||
| 47.2 % | −1.5 | 9,814 | ||
| 47.0 % | −1.4 | 15,832 | ||
| 47.0 % | −2.2 | 4,105 | ||
| 46.7 % | −1.5 | 11,728 | ||
| 46.6 % | −3.3 | 15,869 | ||
| 46.6 % | −1.3 | 2,041 | ||
| 46.4 % | −5.9 | 422 | ||
| 45.9 % | −3.2 | 9,110 | ||
| 45.6 % | −9.8 | 139 | ||
| 44.7 % | −2.2 | 3,681 |
Tahm Kench vs Evelynn: questions and answers
Who wins, Tahm Kench or Evelynn?
Tahm Kench wins 54.3 % of Support games against Evelynn, from 149 ranked games. Evelynn wins the other 45.7 %.
Who wins the lane, Tahm Kench or Evelynn?
At 15 minutes Tahm Kench is 9 gold behind Evelynn on average, with +3.2 CS and +142 XP against Evelynn, from 132 games with lane data.
Is Evelynn a hard matchup for Tahm Kench?
Both champions’ own win rates in the Support role predict 50.3 % for Tahm Kench. The real 54.3 % is 4.0 points higher: this matchup is better for Tahm Kench than the two champions’ strength suggests. By win rate, Evelynn is place 35 of 127 among Tahm Kench’s Support opponents with at least 100 games.
Who counters Evelynn?
The highest win rates against Evelynn in the Support role: Lulu (55.6 %), Soraka (57.3 %) and Rakan (57.8 %).
From ranked games ggez.gg collected through the Riot API.