Cassiopeia vs Zac
Cassiopeia wins 51.6 % of games against Zac, weighted by rank.
Only 133 games so far: read this as a hint, not as a verdict.
Lane lead
Cassiopeia against Zac at 10 and 15 minutes, average of 119 ranked games (Solo/Duo, last 30 days). Plus = Cassiopeia is ahead.
| at 10 min | at 15 min | |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | +236Cassiopeia against everyone: −92 | +268Cassiopeia against everyone: −287 |
| CS | +18.2Cassiopeia against everyone: +3.8 | +25.9Cassiopeia against everyone: +3.9 |
| Experience | +191Cassiopeia against everyone: −71 | +140Cassiopeia against everyone: −190 |
By rank
Cassiopeia win rate against Zac in each rank.
| Rank | Win Rate | Zac wins50 %Cassiopeia wins | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| too few games | 2 | ||
| too few games | 2 | ||
| too few games | 5 | ||
| too few games | 12 | ||
| too few games | 28 | ||
| too few games | 42 | ||
| too few games | 19 | ||
| too few games | 17 | ||
| too few games | 5 | ||
| too few games | 1 |
Rows count games as played (133 in all). The win rate in the head weights each rank by its share of all ranked players, so it is not the plain average of these rows. Patch 26.22: 45 games, too few for a win rate
Cassiopeia's other Mid matchups
Opponents with at least 100 games. Games from patch 26.19 to 26.22.
| Champion | 50 % | Games | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.4 % | +3.2 | 454 | ||
| 55.2 % | +3.5 | 306 | ||
| 55.1 % | +8.1 | 145 | ||
| 54.0 % | +7.6 | 202 | ||
| 52.6 % | +2.1 | 316 | ||
| 52.5 % | −0.5 | 591 | ||
| 51.9 % | +5.5 | 186 | ||
| 51.6 % | +6.4 | 133 | ||
| 51.1 % | +4.4 | 173 | ||
| 50.5 % | +2.4 | 695 | ||
| 50.2 % | +1.0 | 3,263 | ||
| 50.1 % | +2.1 | 5,816 | ||
| 50.1 % | +3.8 | 143 | ||
| 49.8 % | +0.1 | 1,794 | ||
| 49.6 % | +6.5 | 326 | ||
| 49.4 % | −0.5 | 2,087 | ||
| 49.0 % | +0.1 | 752 | ||
| 49.0 % | −0.6 | 330 | ||
| 48.8 % | +1.2 | 8,267 | ||
| 48.8 % | +1.3 | 2,206 | ||
| 48.5 % | +4.9 | 196 | ||
| 48.2 % | −1.0 | 3,113 | ||
| 48.2 % | +2.2 | 213 | ||
| 48.1 % | +3.8 | 853 | ||
| 48.0 % | +1.7 | 5,859 | ||
| 48.0 % | +2.3 | 4,627 | ||
| 47.8 % | +3.0 | 324 | ||
| 47.7 % | +2.6 | 804 | ||
| 47.7 % | +0.2 | 309 | ||
| 47.5 % | −1.8 | 4,969 | ||
| 47.5 % | −4.3 | 154 | ||
| 47.4 % | −0.7 | 2,003 | ||
| 47.3 % | +0.9 | 381 | ||
| 47.2 % | +0.5 | 394 | ||
| 47.1 % | +2.2 | 3,825 | ||
| 47.0 % | −2.1 | 479 | ||
| 47.0 % | +0.5 | 407 | ||
| 47.0 % | +3.5 | 191 | ||
| 47.0 % | −2.9 | 113 | ||
| 46.8 % | −0.2 | 4,095 | ||
| 46.8 % | +2.3 | 184 | ||
| 46.7 % | +1.0 | 11,360 | ||
| 46.7 % | +1.4 | 10,456 | ||
| 46.5 % | +0.5 | 1,682 | ||
| 46.4 % | −1.2 | 7,733 | ||
| 46.4 % | +1.7 | 4,788 | ||
| 46.3 % | +0.3 | 4,635 | ||
| 46.2 % | −4.2 | 175 | ||
| 46.1 % | +0.3 | 2,327 | ||
| 46.1 % | +0.9 | 561 | ||
| 46.0 % | −1.5 | 8,041 | ||
| 45.7 % | −0.3 | 4,229 | ||
| 45.6 % | +0.9 | 471 | ||
| 45.5 % | −0.1 | 425 | ||
| 45.5 % | +2.5 | 259 | ||
| 45.5 % | −2.2 | 172 | ||
| 45.5 % | −2.6 | 120 | ||
| 45.3 % | −2.0 | 2,549 | ||
| 45.2 % | +0.7 | 4,801 | ||
| 45.2 % | −1.3 | 3,429 | ||
| 45.2 % | +0.8 | 1,040 | ||
| 45.2 % | −2.9 | 178 | ||
| 45.1 % | −0.2 | 997 | ||
| 45.0 % | −0.1 | 3,972 | ||
| 44.9 % | −5.7 | 235 | ||
| 44.9 % | −1.3 | 189 | ||
| 44.8 % | −0.6 | 11,779 | ||
| 44.7 % | −1.5 | 8,188 | ||
| 44.7 % | −1.9 | 2,448 | ||
| 44.7 % | −0.7 | 253 | ||
| 44.5 % | +0.7 | 455 | ||
| 44.5 % | −6.7 | 125 | ||
| 44.3 % | −1.8 | 1,622 | ||
| 44.2 % | −1.3 | 641 | ||
| 44.2 % | −0.5 | 443 | ||
| 44.2 % | +0.5 | 101 | ||
| 44.1 % | −0.1 | 5,082 | ||
| 44.1 % | −2.0 | 2,536 | ||
| 44.1 % | −3.8 | 264 | ||
| 43.9 % | −3.0 | 187 | ||
| 43.5 % | −0.9 | 5,059 | ||
| 43.2 % | −2.7 | 700 | ||
| 43.0 % | −3.8 | 331 | ||
| 42.9 % | −3.4 | 10,693 | ||
| 42.9 % | −0.1 | 212 | ||
| 42.8 % | −1.0 | 400 | ||
| 42.7 % | −2.5 | 3,683 | ||
| 42.6 % | −0.9 | 659 | ||
| 42.5 % | −2.0 | 6,287 | ||
| 42.5 % | −2.9 | 1,149 | ||
| 42.5 % | −3.0 | 1,083 | ||
| 42.4 % | −2.7 | 2,123 | ||
| 42.4 % | −3.4 | 112 | ||
| 42.3 % | −2.1 | 5,382 | ||
| 42.3 % | +1.3 | 209 | ||
| 41.6 % | −3.2 | 1,504 | ||
| 41.5 % | −4.1 | 832 | ||
| 40.7 % | −2.1 | 450 | ||
| 40.5 % | −8.7 | 164 | ||
| 40.4 % | −3.6 | 4,651 | ||
| 37.9 % | −8.4 | 171 |
Cassiopeia vs Zac: questions and answers
Who wins, Cassiopeia or Zac?
Cassiopeia wins 51.6 % of Mid games against Zac, from 133 ranked games. Zac wins the other 48.4 %.
Who wins the lane, Cassiopeia or Zac?
At 15 minutes Cassiopeia is 268 gold ahead of Zac on average, with +25.9 CS and +140 XP against Zac, from 119 games with lane data.
Is Zac a hard matchup for Cassiopeia?
Both champions’ own win rates in the Mid role predict 45.2 % for Cassiopeia. The real 51.6 % is 6.4 points higher: this matchup is better for Cassiopeia than the two champions’ strength suggests. By win rate, Zac is place 8 of 101 among Cassiopeia’s Mid opponents with at least 100 games.
Who counters Zac?
The highest win rates against Zac in the Mid role: Ahri (58.9 %), Vladimir (59.2 %) and Swain (64.0 %).
From ranked games ggez.gg collected through the Riot API.